[ad_1]
The claim: New Minnesota bill would protect pedophiles as a sexual orientation
An April 28 Instagram post (direct link, archive link) shows a screenshot of a tweet that discusses a bill recently introduced in Minnesota.
“In Minnesota, there is a new bill that has just been proposed by a Democrat legislator that would protect pedophilia as a sexual orientation,” reads text within the post. “It is called the ‘Take Pride Act’ – HF 1655 – and was introduced earlier this year by state Rep. Leigh Finke, the first transgender legislator in Minnesota House history.”
The post garnered more than 1,000 likes in five days, while the original tweet garnered more than 2,000 likes in six days. Similar versions of the claim have been shared on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.
Follow us on Facebook!Like our page to get updates throughout the day on our latest debunks
Our rating: False
The bill wouldn’t protect pedophiles as a “sexual orientation.” Rather, it removed language from the law that linked pedophilia and sexual orientation. An amendment added on April 26 – two days before this post – directly says the physical and sexual attraction to children isn’t protected by the bill.
Bill doesn’t protect pedophiles
HF 1655, also known as the “Take Pride Act,” creates protections against discrimination and redefines sexual orientation and gender identity, among other things. It has not yet passed.
It removes the following phrase from the previous definition of sexual orientation: “‘Sexual orientation’ does not include a physical or sexual attachment to children by an adult.”
This doesn’t mean the bill protects pedophiles from discrimination, however.
Minnesota state Rep. Leigh Finke, one of the bill’s authors, told USA TODAY the claim is false.
“The bill updates outdated language that incorrectly ties pedophilia to a person’s sexual orientation,” Finke said in an email. “Nothing in the bill changes or weakens any crimes against children, or the state’s ability to prosecute those who break the law. Of course, pedophilia is not a sexual orientation – which is why the language never should have been included in the statutory definition in the first place.”
State Rep. Jamie Becker-Finn, a co-author of the bill, said the same thing during an April 26 House floor session.
Fact check: No, new Canadian bill won’t allow prosecution of those who misgender others
The same day, an amendment was added to the bill that reads: “The physical or sexual attachment to children by an adult is not a protected class under this chapter.”
Michael Boucai, a professor at the University at Buffalo School of Law who has done research on sexuality and law, told USA TODAY that sexual orientation has never been legally interpreted this way.
“I’m unaware of any antidiscrimination law – ever – whose reference to ‘sexual orientation’ was intended by legislators or has been interpreted by courts to encompass pedophilia.”
USA TODAY reached out to the Instagram user who shared the post for comment but did not immediately receive a response. The Twitter user who shared the claim directed USA TODAY to a Fox News article discussing the new bill, but it does not make the claim made in the social media post.
The claim has also been debunked by PolitiFact.
Our fact-check sources:
- Leigh Finke, May 4, Email exchange with USA TODAY
- MNHouseInfo (YouTube), April 27, House Floor Session 4/26/23 – Part 3
- Minnesota Legislature, March 13, HF 1655
- Minnesota Legislature, April 26, Journal of the House – 57th Day – Wednesday, April 26, 2023 – Top of Page 7071
- Minnesota Legislature, accessed May 4, 2022 Minnesota Statutes
- Minnesota Legislature, February, Take Pride Act (HF 1655/SF 1886)
- Michael Boucai, May 4, Email exchange with USA TODAY
Thank you for supporting our journalism. You can subscribe to our print edition, ad-free app or electronic newspaper replica here.
Our fact-check work is supported in part by a grant from Facebook.
[ad_2]
Source link
