Julian Assange ‘too unwell’ to attend last-ditch hearing to fight US extradition

[ad_1]

Key Points
  • Assange was arrested in 2019 after spending seven years holed up in Ecuador’s London embassy.
  • UK courts previously blocked his extradition, but the High Court reversed the decision on appeal in 2021.
  • Assange’s lawyers are now appealing on grounds including that the decades-long prison sentence he faces is “disproportionate”.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was absent from a London court due to illness Tuesday, as his lawyers launched a likely last bid to appeal against his extradition to the United States to face espionage charges.
Washington indicted Assange multiple times between 2018 and 2020 over WikiLeaks’ publication of secret military and diplomatic files on the US-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

On the first of two days of evidence before two High Court judges, the 52-year-old’s leading lawyer said previous rulings contained “errors of law” and that the US charges against him are “political”.

“There is a real risk that he will suffer flagrant denial of justice” if sent to the US, Edward Fitzgerald KC, one of Assange’s lawyers, argued.
Earlier, Fitzgerald told the judges that Assange was “not well today” and would not attend in person or via video.

Lawyers for the US government will present their arguments on Wednesday. It was unclear if Assange will attend then.

Reporters Without Borders said it was “concerned”. The media advocacy group noted that when it visited Assange last month at Belmarsh high-security prison in London, he was unwell and had broken a rib from excessive coughing.
It “highlights the risks to his physical and mental health that exist in his current detention conditions, which would be exacerbated if extradited,” the NGO added.
US President Joe Biden has faced sustained domestic and international pressure to drop the 18-count indictment against Assange in a Virginia federal court, which was filed under his predecessor Donald Trump.
Major media organisations, press freedom advocates and the Australian parliament are among those decrying the prosecution under the 1917 Espionage Act, which has never been used over the publishing of classified information.

Washington alleges Assange and others at WikiLeaks recruited and agreed with hackers to conduct “one of the largest compromises of classified information” in US history.

[ad_2]

Source link